The experimental value of d is found to be smaller than the estimate obtained using Graham's law. This is due to- Alarger mean free path for X as compared to that of Y.
- Blarger mean free path for Y as compared to that of X.
- Cincreased collision frequency of Y with the inert gas as compared to that of X with the inert gas.
- Dincreased collision frequency of X with the inert gas as compared to that of Y with the inert gas.
View written solutionFree
Correct answer: D
- What Graham's law would predict
For two gases/vapours diffusing from opposite ends, Graham's law gives
If the first visible product forms where the two fronts meet, then the distances travelled satisfy
With ,
So Graham's law predicts the product should first appear at from the plug soaked in .
But experimentally, is smaller than this. That means the product forms closer to the X end than Graham's law predicts. Hence, in reality, diffuses less effectively relative to than Graham's law estimate suggests.
- Why Graham's law is not exact here
Graham's law is most appropriate when comparing diffusion/effusion under simplified conditions. Here, both vapours diffuse through an inert gas already present at 1 atm. So each vapour undergoes repeated collisions mainly with inert-gas molecules.
Thus, the relative diffusion is controlled not only by molar masses of and , but also by how frequently each collides with the inert gas.
- Compare molecular speeds of X and Y
At the same temperature,
Since
we have
So molecules of move faster and therefore collide more frequently with inert-gas molecules than molecules of do.
- Effect on diffusion distance
More frequent collisions with the inert gas hinder the net progress of more strongly. Therefore, compared to the Graham's law estimate, does not advance as far as expected. So the meeting point shifts towards the X end, making smaller.
This matches the observation.
- Check options
-
A: larger mean free path for than for
This would help diffuse farther, making larger, not smaller. Incorrect. -
B: larger mean free path for than for
While this could shift the point toward , the more direct kinetic explanation here is collision frequency with inert gas. -
C: increased collision frequency of with inert gas compared to
This would hinder more, pushing meeting point away from , so would increase. Incorrect. -
D: increased collision frequency of with inert gas compared to
This hinders more, so the product appears closer to the end and becomes smaller. Correct.
- Final answer
The correct option is
More from Chemical Kinetics and Nuclear Chemistry
- In the reaction, P + Q R + S, the time taken for 75% reaction of P is twice the time taken for 50% reaction of P. The concentration of Q varies with reaction time as shown in the figure. The overall order of the reaction is Includes diagram2013 · MCQ
- In the nuclear transmutation 9 + X 8 + Y (X, Y) is (are) :2013 · Multiple correct
- An organic compound undergoes first-order decomposition. The time taken for its decomposition to 1/8 and 1/10 of its initial concentration are t1/8 and t1/10 respectively. What is the value of …2012 · Numerical
- The periodic table consists of 18 groups. An isotope of copper, on bombardment with protons undergoes a nuclear reaction yielding element X as shown below. To which group, element X belongs in the periodic table? +…2012 · Numerical
- Bombardment of aluminium by -particle leads to its artificial disintegration in two ways : (i) and (ii) as shown. Products X, Y and Z, respectively, are Includes diagram2011 · MCQ
- For the first order reaction 2 (g) 4 (g) + (g)2011 · Multiple correct
- The concentration of R in the reaction R P was measured as a function of time and the following data is obtained The order of reaction is Includes table2010 · Numerical
- The number of neutrons emitted when undergoes controlled nuclear fission to and is2010 · Numerical