- Interpret the limit carefully
We need to evaluate
n→∞lim(n+1)a−1[(na+1)+(na+2)+⋯+(na+n)]1a+2a+⋯+na=601
with a∈R and a=−1.
We must determine which options satisfy this.
- Simplify the sum in the denominator
Consider
(na+1)+(na+2)+⋯+(na+n).
This is a sum of n terms:
=n(na)+(1+2+⋯+n)
=n2a+2n(n+1).
So the denominator becomes
(n+1)a−1(n2a+2n(n+1)).
For large n,
(n+1)a−1∼na−1,
and
n2a+2n(n+1)∼n2(a+21).
Hence the whole denominator behaves like
na−1⋅n2(a+21)=na+1(a+21).
- Asymptotic form of the numerator
For a>−1,
1a+2a+⋯+na∼a+1na+1.
Therefore the limit becomes
n→∞limna+1(a+21)a+1na+1=(a+1)(a+21)1.
So we must have
(a+1)(a+21)1=601.
Thus
(a+1)(a+21)=60.
- Solve for a
Expand:
(a+1)(a+21)=a2+23a+21.
So
a2+23a+21=60
a2+23a−2119=0.
Multiply by 2:
2a2+3a−119=0.
Now factor:
2a2+17a−14a−119=0
(a−7)(2a+17)=0.
Hence
a=7ora=−217.
- Check validity of both roots
Our asymptotic formula
k=1∑nka∼a+1na+1
was used for a>−1.
So:
- a=7 is valid.
- a=−217<−1 is not valid for that asymptotic formula.
Now check a=−217 directly.
If a<−1, then
k=1∑nka
converges to a finite positive constant as n→∞.
But the denominator behaves as
(n+1)a−1(n2a+2n(n+1))∼na+1(a+21).
For a=−217,
a+1=−215,
so
na+1=n−15/2→0.
Hence the denominator tends to 0 (not a finite nonzero number), while the numerator tends to a positive finite constant. Therefore the quotient does not approach 601.
So a=−217 is rejected.
- Evaluate options
-
A: 5
(5+1)(5+1/2)1=6⋅11/21=331=601
Not correct.
-
B: 7
(7+1)(7+1/2)1=8⋅15/21=601
Correct.
-
C: −215
Here a<−1, so numerator converges, denominator →0; limit is not 601.
Not correct.
-
D: −217
Same issue; not correct.
- Final answer
The only correct option is
7.