JEE AdvancedMathematicsDifferentiationMCQ+3 / −1
Let and be real valued functions defined on interval such that is continuous, , , and STATEMENT - 1: and STATEMENT - 2:
- AStatement - 1 is True, Statement - 2 is True; Statement - 2 is a correct explanation for Statement - 1
- BStatement - 1 is True, Statement - 2 is True; Statement - 2 is NOT a correct explanation for Statement - 1
- CStatement - 1 is True, Statement -2 is False
- DStatement - 1 is False, Statement -2 is True
View written solutionFree
Correct answer: A
Analysis of Statement - 2
- We are given the function .
- To find , we use the product rule for differentiation:
- Now, we evaluate at :
- We are given that . Also, we know and .
- Thus, the statement is True.
Analysis of Statement - 1
-
Statement - 1 is the equality: .
-
Let's first evaluate the limit on the left-hand side (LHS). Let's call it .
-
As , the numerator becomes , and the denominator becomes . This is a indeterminate form, so we can apply L'Hôpital's Rule.
-
Differentiating the numerator and the denominator with respect to :
- Numerator derivative: .
- Denominator derivative: .
-
The limit becomes:
-
Substituting and using the given condition : So, the LHS is 0.
-
Now, let's evaluate the right-hand side (RHS), which is . We have . Differentiating again with respect to :
-
Evaluating at and using : So, the RHS is 0.
-
Since LHS = 0 and RHS = 0, Statement - 1 is True.
Analysis of the Explanation
- We need to determine if Statement - 2 is the correct explanation for Statement - 1.
- Let's establish a direct connection between the LHS and RHS of Statement - 1. Start with the definition of the second derivative:
- From Statement - 2, we know . Substituting this into the definition of :
- Now, substitute the expression for :
- We can split this limit into two parts:
- The first term evaluates to .
- The second term can be related to the limit from Statement - 1: Since , the second term in the expression for is equal to .
- So, we have established the relationship: .
- Statement - 1 asserts that . This is true if and only if .
- Since we are given that , Statement - 1 is true.
- The derivation of the crucial relationship depends on using Statement - 2 (substituting with ). This relationship explains why Statement - 1 holds true under the given condition . Therefore, Statement - 2 is a correct explanation for Statement - 1.
Both statements are true, and Statement - 2 is the correct explanation for Statement - 1.
More from Differentiation
- Consider the function defined by Which of the following is true?2008 · MCQ
- Let , where is a twice differentiable positive function on (0, ) such that . Then for N = 1, 2, 3, ..., 2008 · MCQ
- Let be the set of all twice differentiable functions from to such that for all . For , let be the number of points for which…2023 · Multiple correct
- Let and be differentiable functions such that and …2016 · Multiple correct
- Let be a thrice differentiable function. Suppose that and for all Let …2015 · Multiple correct
- Let be a function which is continuous on and is differentiable on with . Let for …2014 · MCQ
- Let where Then the value of …2011 · Numerical
- Consider the functions defined implicitly by the equation on various intervals in the real line. If , the equation implicitly defines a unique real valued differentiable function . If …2008 · MCQ