- AStatement - is true, Statement - is true, Statement - is the correct explanation of Statement -
- BStatement - is true, Statement - is true, Statement - is not the correct explanation of Statement -
- CStatement - is false, Statement - is true
- DStatement - is true, Statement - is false.
View written solutionFree
Correct answer: B
-
Identify the situation
This is the case of Newton’s rings in reflected light.
A thin air film is formed between:
- the lower convex surface of the plano-convex lens, and
- the upper plane surface of the glass plate.
The two interfering reflected rays come from:
- reflection at the lens-air interface (top surface of the air film),
- reflection at the air-glass plate interface (bottom surface of the air film).
-
Check Statement-1
Statement-1 says:
When light reflects from the air-glass plate interface, the reflected wave suffers a phase change of .
Rule of reflection:
- Reflection from a rarer to denser medium gives a phase shift of .
- Reflection from a denser to rarer medium gives no phase shift.
Here, reflection is at the air-glass plate interface:
- air is optically rarer,
- glass is optically denser.
Therefore, the reflected ray indeed suffers a phase change of .
So, Statement-1 is true.
-
Check Statement-2
Statement-2 says:
The center of the interference pattern is dark.
At the center of Newton’s rings, the film thickness is
The geometrical path difference between the two reflected rays is then zero, but one of the rays gets an additional phase shift of due to reflection at the air-glass interface.
Hence the effective path difference is in phase terms, producing destructive interference.
Therefore, the center is dark.
So, Statement-2 is true.
-
Check the relation between the statements
- Statement-1 explains that one reflected ray gets a phase change of .
- Because of this phase reversal, even when at the center, the two reflected rays interfere destructively.
- Hence the center is dark.
Therefore, Statement-1 is the explanation of Statement-2, not the other way around.
But option A says Statement-2 explains Statement-1, which is incorrect. Option B says both are true, but Statement-2 is not the correct explanation of Statement-1. This is correct.
-
Evaluate options
- A: Both true, but wrong explanation direction Incorrect
- B: Both true, and Statement-2 is not the correct explanation of Statement-1 Correct
- C: Statement-1 false, Statement-2 true Incorrect
- D: Statement-1 true, Statement-2 false Incorrect
Therefore, the correct option is B.
More from Wave Optics
- An initially parallel cylindrical beam travels in a medium of refractive index where and are positive constants and is the intensity of the light beam. The…2010 · MCQ
- A mixture of light, consisting of wavelength and an unknown wavelength, illuminates Young's double slit and gives rise to two overlapping interference patterns on the screen. The central maximum of both lights coincide. Further, it…2009 · MCQ
- In a Young's double slit experiment the intensity at a point where the path difference is ( being the wavelength of light used ) is . If denotes the maximum intensity, is equal to2007 · MCQ
- Two point white dots are apart on a black paper. They are viewed by eye of pupil diameter Approximately, what is the maximum distance at which these dots can be resolved by the eye? [ Take wavelength of light ]2005 · MCQ
- A Young's double slit experiment uses a monochromatic source. The shape of the interference fringes formed on a screen is2005 · MCQ
- If is the intensity of the principal maximum in the single slit diffraction pattern, then what will be its intensity when the slit width is doubled?2005 · MCQ
- When an unpolarized light of intensity is incident on a polarizing sheet, the intensity of the light which does not get transmitted is2005 · MCQ
- The maximum number of possible interference maxima for slit-separation equal to twice the wavelength in Young's double-slit experiment, is :2004 · MCQ