- Given function
We have
f(x)=∫0xt(sinx−sint)dt.
We want to test which differential relation is satisfied by f(x).
- Rewrite the integral
Since sinx is constant with respect to t,
f(x)=sinx∫0xtdt−∫0xtsintdt.
Now,
∫0xtdt=2x2.
So,
f(x)=2x2sinx−∫0xtsintdt.
- Differentiate using Leibniz rule
A cleaner way is to differentiate the original form directly.
Let
F(x,t)=t(sinx−sint).
Then
f(x)=∫0xF(x,t)dt.
Using Leibniz rule,
f′(x)=∫0x∂x∂F(x,t)dt+F(x,x).
Now,
∂x∂F=tcosx,
and
F(x,x)=x(sinx−sinx)=0.
Hence,
f′(x)=∫0xtcosxdt=cosx∫0xtdt=2x2cosx.
- Second derivative
Differentiate:
f′′(x)=dxd(2x2cosx).
Using product rule,
f′′(x)=xcosx−2x2sinx.
- Third derivative
Differentiate again:
f′′′(x)=dxd(xcosx−2x2sinx).
Now,
dxd(xcosx)=cosx−xsinx,
dxd(2x2sinx)=xsinx+2x2cosx.
Therefore,
f′′′(x)=cosx−xsinx−(xsinx+2x2cosx)
so
f′′′(x)=cosx−2xsinx−2x2cosx.
- Check each option
We already have
f′(x)=2x2cosx,
f′′(x)=xcosx−2x2sinx,
f′′′(x)=cosx−2xsinx−2x2cosx.
Option A
f′′′(x)+f′′(x)
contains terms like xcosx, x2sinx, etc., so it cannot simplify to just sinx.
Hence, A is false.
Option B
f′′′(x)+f′′(x)−f′(x)
also contains extra x and x2 terms, so it is not equal to just cosx.
Hence, B is false.
Option C
f′′′(x)+f′(x)=(cosx−2xsinx−2x2cosx)+2x2cosx.
The 2x2cosx terms cancel, giving
f′′′(x)+f′(x)=cosx−2xsinx.
This matches exactly.
Hence, C is true.
Option D
f′′′(x)−f′′(x)
will still contain extra terms and does not reduce to cosx−2xsinx.
Hence, D is false.
- Final answer
The correct option is
C
with relation
f′′′(x)+f′(x)=cosx−2xsinx.
- Comparison with stored answer
Stored correct answer: C
Our derived answer: C
So they agree.