- AStatement - 1 is True, Statement - 2 is True; Statement - 2 is a correct explanation for Statement - 1
- BStatement - 1 is True, Statement - 2 is True; Statement - 2 is NOT a correct explanation for Statement - 1
- CStatement - 1 is True, Statement - 2 is False
- DStatement - 1 is False, Statement - 2 is True
View written solutionFree
Correct answer: A
Step-by-step Solution:
The given system of linear equations is:
This system can be written in matrix form as , where: , , and
Analysis of Statement - 1
Statement - 1 : The system of equations has no solution for .
To determine the nature of the solution, we first calculate the determinant of the coefficient matrix, .
Since , the system will have either infinitely many solutions or no solution.
To find the condition for consistency, we can use Gaussian elimination on the augmented matrix .
Apply row operations:
Next, apply :
The last row represents the equation , which simplifies to .
- If (i.e., ), the equation becomes , which is a contradiction. In this case, the system is inconsistent and has no solution.
- If (i.e., ), the equation becomes , which is always true. The system has infinitely many solutions.
Therefore, the system of equations has no solution for .
Conclusion: Statement - 1 is True.
Analysis of Statement - 2
Statement - 2 : The determinant , for .
Let's calculate the value of the determinant:
The statement says that this determinant is not equal to zero for . If , then , which means . So, the determinant is zero only when . For any value , the determinant will be non-zero.
Conclusion: Statement - 2 is True.
Relationship between Statement - 1 and Statement - 2
-
We found that Statement 1 is true. The condition for the system to have no solution is . The mathematical reason is that and the system becomes inconsistent if .
-
We found that Statement 2 is also true. It states that a certain determinant is non-zero for . This determinant evaluates to . So, Statement 2 is equivalent to the condition for .
-
The condition is precisely the reason why the system in Statement 1 is inconsistent (has no solution), given that we already established . Statement 2 provides this crucial condition.
Therefore, Statement 2 is a correct explanation for Statement 1.
Final Choice: Statement - 1 is True, Statement - 2 is True; Statement - 2 is a correct explanation for Statement - 1. This corresponds to option A.
More from Matrices and Determinants
- Consider the matrix Let the transpose of a matrix be denoted by . Then the number of invertible matrices with…2025 · MCQ
- Let and . Let for some non-zero real…2025 · Multiple correct
- Let denote . Let Then which of the following…2024 · Multiple correct
- Let and , where denotes the determinant of . Then…2024 · Numerical
- Let and be the distinct roots of the equation . Consider the set . For a matrix , define and … Includes table2024 · MCQ
- Let and be real numbers. Consider the following system of linear equations Match each entry in List-I to… Includes table2023 · MCQ
- Let , be the matrix such that if is divisible by , otherwise . Then which of the following statements is(are) true?2023 · Multiple correct
- Let . Then the number of invertible matrices in is :2023 · Numerical