- A
- B
- Cat least
- Dless than
View written solutionFree
Correct answer: C
- Interpret the question
We need the number of matrices with:
- exactly four entries equal to ,
- all remaining five entries equal to ,
- and the matrix must be non-singular (i.e. determinant ).
So we must count all invertible - matrices of size having exactly four 's.
- Necessary condition for non-singularity
If any row or any column is entirely zero, then the determinant is .
Since there are exactly four 's distributed among rows, for a non-singular matrix each row must contain at least one . Similarly, each column must contain at least one .
Now ones are to be distributed among rows with each row having at least one . Thus the row-sum pattern must be:
up to permutation.
Similarly, the column-sum pattern must also be:
up to permutation.
So every invertible matrix of this type must have exactly one row containing two 's, and exactly one column containing two 's.
- Count such matrices systematically
Choose:
- the row which has two 's: choices,
- the column which has two 's: choices.
Now fix such a row and such a column. We count the number of matrices with row sums and column sums .
Let the special row be and the special column be .
Because column must contain two 's, and the other two columns contain one each, and row must contain two 's, there are exactly two possible patterns:
Case 1: entry
Then row needs one more in one of the other two columns. Also column needs one more in one of the other two rows. The remaining two rows and two columns then get forced uniquely. This gives 2 possibilities.
Case 2: entry
Then row must have 's in both the other columns, and column must have 's in both the other rows. Again the matrix is uniquely determined. This gives 1 possibility.
Let us verify by taking a concrete example: suppose row 1 and column 1 are the ones with sum . Then the possible matrices are
But the third matrix is singular because rows 2 and 3 are equal. So we must check non-singularity carefully.
Thus the above raw count includes singular cases.
- Better approach: count non-singular ones directly
A matrix with exactly four 's is singular if:
- some row/column is zero, or
- two rows are equal, or
- rows are linearly dependent.
Since row sums must be , the two rows with a single must be in different columns, otherwise they become equal and determinant becomes . Also, the row with two 's must contain those two columns, and the remaining column must contain the lone of the third row.
So a non-singular matrix must have row patterns exactly of the form:
where are distinct and . In other words:
- one row has ones in two columns,
- the other two rows have a single each,
- and those single 's are in two different columns,
- one of those columns is shared with the double- row, and the third column is occupied by the remaining single- row.
A clean way to count:
- Choose the row having two 's: choices.
- Choose the column where the row having two 's has a : choices. (equivalently, choose which two columns contain its 's.)
- For the remaining two rows, place the two single 's in the two columns not both same; to keep all columns nonzero and rows distinct, their positions are forced up to permutation between the two rows: choices.
Hence total number is
- Check with examples
For example, if row 1 has two 's and its zero is in column 3, then row 1 is
To make the matrix invertible, rows 2 and 3 must be
or
and these can be assigned to rows 2 and 3 in ways in each pattern? Let's test carefully.
Actually, for row 1 = , the remaining two rows must be one of the following unordered pairs:
- and ,
- and .
Each unordered pair can be arranged in rows 2 and 3 in ways, giving possibilities for this row pattern.
So my previous count of may be incomplete. Let us recount properly.
- Most reliable counting via row types
Choose the row with two 's.
Step 6.1: Choose the row having two 's
This can be done in
ways.
Step 6.2: Choose the pattern of that row
A row with exactly two 's can be one of:
So there are
choices.
Step 6.3: Choose the other two rows
Suppose the chosen two- row is . Then to make all columns nonzero and avoid dependence, the remaining two rows must be two distinct standard basis rows chosen from
such that together with they form an invertible matrix.
The valid pairs are:
- and ,
- and .
Pair and is invalid because then column 3 is zero.
So there are valid unordered pairs, and each can be arranged in the two remaining row positions in
ways.
Hence for a fixed two- row pattern and fixed row position, number of matrices is
Therefore total number is
- Sanity check with one example
Take row 1 = . Then the four valid completions are
Each has determinant , hence non-singular.
Similarly for each of the choices of the row pattern and positions of that row. Thus total is indeed
- Compare with options
The number of such matrices is . Now evaluate the options:
- A: — false
- B: — false
- C: at least — true
- D: less than — false
Since this is an MCQ with single correct option, the only valid statement is:
- Comparison with stored correct answer
Stored correct answer is C. My derived answer is also C.
So they agree.
More from Matrices and Determinants
- Consider the system of linear equations; The system has :2010 · MCQ
- Let be a matrix with non-zero entries and let where is identity matrix. Define sum of diagonal elements of and determinant of matrix . Statement- 1: …2010 · MCQ
- Let be such that if …2009 · MCQ
- Let be any real numbers. Suppose that there are real numbers not all zero such that and Then is equal to :2008 · MCQ
- Let be matrix with real entries. Let be the identity matrix. Denote by tr , the sum of diagonal entries of . Assume that Statement-1 : If and , then det …2008 · MCQ
- If for then is :2007 · MCQ
- If and are square matrices of size such that then which of the following will be always true?2006 · MCQ
- Let and Then2006 · MCQ